Many trade experts have suggested ways to move forward
following the deadlock in the Doha Round. Chiefly among them is for smaller
groups of countries to negotiate and implement policies that they can then
extend to other WTO members as and when they are ready. The simple argument
behind this proposal is that agreement can be reached faster and easier among
smaller number of negotiating countries. The question is: can
multilateralization really be achieved at faster rate via this proposal, as is
suggested, or is it going to further burden the already complex environment? In
other words, is this a building or stumbling block?
Let me give a negative perspective of this proposal. When
countries negotiate, they do so from their own perspectives, taking into account
their own interests. One can argue that although agreement can be reached more
efficiently, the contents are probably narrower in a sense that it takes into
account only the interests of the negotiating countries. If this agreement is
to be eventually extended to other WTO members, will they take it at face
value? Well, perhaps not since their interests have most likely not been
included in the first place. When the time comes, these members will want to
amend some parts of the agreement before they will subscribe to it. However,
will the original negotiating countries agree since they will have to concede on
some points.
No comments:
Post a Comment