Just as there are many valid reasons against standard
harmonization, there are also many credible reasons for it. But there is one
reason for standard harmonization that I just can’t get around: the idea of
preventing race to the bottom. The argument goes that in the current globalized
world where it is so much easier for firms to relocate their production plants
to low-cost locations, firms with existing plants in countries with higher
standards (higher cost) can easily shift them to countries with lower standards
(lower cost), resulting in job losses. To prevent such a move, countries with
higher standards will revise down their requirements and spark a race to the
bottom, causing lower standards across the world.
My gripe is driven by the fact that there is no clear
evidence where countries have lowered their standards in order to prevent job
losses. On the other hand, most countries benefiting from FDI appear to have
raised their standards, partly driven by the more demanding middle class whose population share has increased. A point of note is a recent
article about how Apple has raised the labour standards in China. Although
critics may say that it is a one-off event caused by the widespread negative
publicity, it is also correct to say that China has come a long way with
regards to how it treats its labour force. Among them, the 2008 labour contract
law should ring a bell to most people, not to mention the latest promise by
China’s Cabinet to raise minimum wage by 13 percent a year until 2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment